Masculinity Ideology and Gender Role Conflict

Authors

Abstract

Masculinity ideology refers to beliefs, constructs, and conceptualizations of the norms and roles of men. This research aimed to find out the level of endorsement of Filipino men to the prevailing masculinity ideology and their level of gender role conflict. Furthermore, this study desired to increase men’s awareness of their roles and work hand in hand with women. A cross-sectional survey research design was utilized for this study. A minimum of 900 questionnaires were purposely distributed to volunteers who were single, working, at least 18 years of age, have finished college, or if not, have at least some college experience to satisfy the requirement for a regression analysis method. Data were subjected to the Pearson R correlation method utilizing SPSS. Results showed the seemingly standing belief that men should be good providers of the family. Individual characteristics defined their roles as being objective, independent, and competitive rather than being physically strong or brave, or attractive to the opposite sex. Among the masculinity ideologies, it is Macho-Guapito (virile -handsome) that is related to all the areas of gender role conflict. Gender role conflict was only slightly experienced by men, with the highest score in the area of success, power, and competition.

Keywords

Social Science gender masculinity ideology cross-sectional survey Pearson R Bohol Philippines

Statistics

#20
46
(2026-08-23 — 2026-09-22)
Abstract views
42
(2026-08-23 — 2026-09-22)
PDF views
88
(2026-08-23 — 2026-09-22)
Total
PDF views (daily)
2026-08-23 — 2026-09-22
Views per day 0 5 10 15 7 2026-08-23 2026-09-22

Daily PDF views over the last 30 days (2026-08-23 — 2026-09-22).

References

Downloads

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): May

Published

2015-05-18

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Kit N. Balane, Godofreda O. Tirol

How to Cite

Balane, K. N., & Tirol, G. O. (2015). Masculinity Ideology and Gender Role Conflict. University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.15631/ubmrj.v3i1.20